From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 14:11:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7AE16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:11:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c3po.servilla.com (c3po.servilla.com [69.44.59.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE2943D46 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:11:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@rackoperations.com) Received: from 67-41-238-27.slkc.qwest.net ([67.41.238.27] helo=[192.168.0.26]) by c3po.servilla.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1CjeXd-0001PU-Sf for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:11:10 -0600 Message-ID: <41D2BB75.7030607@rackoperations.com> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:13:09 -0700 From: Sean Countryman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <34657.24.230.37.14.1104187002.squirrel@24.230.37.14> <2990.24.98.86.57.1104197295.squirrel@24.98.86.57> <41D0C276.7080100@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - c3po.servilla.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - rackoperations.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Found security expliot in port phpBB 2.0.8 FreeBSD4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:11:14 -0000 You could also ask the wind to stop blowing... Like it or not, PHP is clearly a dominate language and is probably here to stay for some time. It's definitely better than some other alternatives (but I'll refrain from flames). Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >Julian Elischer writes: > > >>might be a good idea if we "urged" users to update their phpbb a bit >>more vocally. >> >> > >...or we could urge them to stop using PHP at all. > >DES > >