From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 25 13:37:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5E037B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43B643F3F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.147.188.198])
          by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with ESMTP
          id <20030425203735003006dvgte>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:37:35 +0000
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198]
	(may be forged))
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h3PKbZoQ003687
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:37:35 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h3PKbYb0003684;
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:37:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to
	freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f
Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <20030424214413.GC90097@grimoire.chen.org.nz>
	<20030425091950.GA558@dhumketu.homeunix.net>
	<3EA92FF1.30809@potentialtech.com>
	<20030425184813.GA674@dhumketu.homeunix.net>
	<448ytye5xj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <3EA9925E.30201@potentialtech.com>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Date: 25 Apr 2003 16:37:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3EA9925E.30201@potentialtech.com>
Message-ID: <444r4me2k1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: Time Problem in 5.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:37:38 -0000

Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> writes:

> I'm going to repeat myself here:
> ntpdate is depreciated.  The functionality in it is duplicated by ntpd.
> It shouldn't even be in the 5.0 tree.  I'm considering filing a pr to
> request that it be removed.  Opinions?

In principle, I'd say that's fine, but I'm not enthusiastic about
making any changes in "contrib" packages unless it's really
necessary...