From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 23:28:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6379437B401; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D714E43F75; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:28:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7]) by mail.imp.ch (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h6T6SpYc073130; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:28:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch) Received: from cvs.imp.ch (cvs.imp.ch [157.161.4.9]) by nbs.imp.ch (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h6T6SplH7268223; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:28:51 +0200 (MES) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:28:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20030729030426.GD8471@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: <20030729082542.O41136@cvs.imp.ch> References: <20030728142857.A41136@cvs.imp.ch> <20030729030426.GD8471@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Martin Blapp cc: Robert Watson cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d dhclient X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 06:28:56 -0000 Folks, > So? That is how DHCP works. I added the "-1" option so it will time > out. Experience using SuSE which does background its dhcp client, I > think this change is a mistake. Please back that part out. It already has been "backed out" 10 hours ago. IMHO rwatson is right and it's a bad idea to immediatly background it on some machines. The users whi like to background it can set it in their rc.conf. > > It already waits the proper amount. Please don't change the algorithm. > If there was no link on the interface you had to wait ~2 mins and tons of requests have been sent to nowhere. Never noticed ? I wait now a max of 2 x polling time (10 seconds). Martin