From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:14:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B0216A4CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:14:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gate.bitblocks.com (bitblocks.com [209.204.185.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB9743D4C; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:14:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.bitblocks.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j34GEDkA006379; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:14:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Message-Id: <200504041614.j34GEDkA006379@gate.bitblocks.com> To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:21:41 CDT." <20050404002141.2819f386@dolphin.local.net> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:14:13 -0700 From: Bakul Shah cc: Tim Kientzle cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heads up: gtar gone from base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:14:24 -0000 > > What is the status of this bug? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=76294 > > > > [summary: certain gzipped tar files can't be untarred > > correctly with -z flag but work fine if with gzcat|tar xvf -] .... > > In a similar vein, I just discovered that KDE's "ark" can no longer > properly extract gzipped tar files: > > tar: unrecognized option `--use-compress-program=gunzip' > > Any chance of adding this option to bsdtar? This is a different issue. --use-compress-program is not supported by bsdtar while -z is supported but broken for certain inputs. One would like see supported features work as advertised but this bug has been around for a while and I have to assume the fix is difficult or whoever is fixing does not have enough free time. Both are perfectly understandable reasons!:-) In this case may be it is easier to fix the port to use gtar?