From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 17:04:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0201B16A4D6 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A3E43F93 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:04:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8H04HTX086392; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:04:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:04:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030916.180417.44250294.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jdp@polstra.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20030916.175558.10083602.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: cliftonr@lava.net cc: dan@langille.org Subject: Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:04:25 -0000 In message: John Polstra writes: : On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: : > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base : > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to : > filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name : > servers in the world to do something about this BS. : : I think so too, in principle. But we need something better than a : hard-coded IP address. It would take Verisign about an hour to figure : out they need to change the address frequently. (Well, OK, a day ... : it's Verisign, after all.) Agreed. but it wouldn't be too hard to determine at boot/hourly doing a bogus query to find the address of the moment. Even they would be hard pressed to change things more than hourly. Warner