From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec  4 07:45:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CC51065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 Dec 2011 07:45:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1547E8FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  4 Dec 2011 07:45:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pB47irMZ002649
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 4 Dec 2011 01:44:53 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <4EDB24F5.9010301@tundraware.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 01:44:53 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
References: <20111203120031.55D471065772@hub.freebsd.org>
	<20111204171900.N3548@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <20111204171900.N3548@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]);
	Sun, 04 Dec 2011 01:44:53 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
	information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: pB47irMZ002649
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
Subject: Re: ipfw And ping
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:45:01 -0000

On 12/04/2011 01:04 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
<SNIP>

>
> For one, google 'icmp redirect attack'

But isn't that handled by setting:


    net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1


> # This is the ICMP rule we generally use:
> #   ipfw add 10 allow icmp from any to any in icmptypes 0,3,4,11,12,14,16,18


Hmmm.... I just tried this and it seems to break ping...