From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 08:23:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96AB16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:23:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2A343D53 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost.englishbreakfastnetwork.org) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/5.2) with ESMTP id j558N2xS007307; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:23:03 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Mathew Schofield Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:22:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506051022.58166.groot@kde.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 131.174.33.4 Cc: Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:23:05 -0000 Mathew, Can we take a look at your mail signature? On Sunday 05 June 2005 07:49, Mathew Schofield wrote: > This is a private letter and only the intended people may read this > message. You may not store, quote or publish this document for any > purposes. The data/information held within this message are for > private use, and no one may disclose it. There are no guarentees that > the information disclosed is accurate, or that the links/attached > files will not be contaminated with Viruses. You use all links, and > all attachments, at your own free will and thus risk. You have been > warned. If you invented this thing, please fix the spelling error in it. Also realize that it's totally pointless to add such a warning when sending a message to _a publicly archived mailing list_. Indeed, taking the signate at face value, the only thing you allow me to do with your message is immediately delete it, since otherwise I'm storing it (and gosh, I'm quoting it in order to reply). If your employer insists on this signature, please have them fix the spelling error and realize the same. -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot