From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jun 8 7:57:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [208.237.135.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4528C37B401 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:57:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca) Received: from mr6.exu.ericsson.se (mr6u3.ericy.com [208.237.135.123]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f58Euja29257; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:56:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from noah.lmc.ericsson.se (noah.lmc.ericsson.se [142.133.1.1]) by mr6.exu.ericsson.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f58Euii15854; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:56:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from lmc35.lmc.ericsson.se (lmc35.lmc.ericsson.se [142.133.16.175]) by noah.lmc.ericsson.se (8.11.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id f58EuiG02577; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:56:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lmc35.lmc.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:56:42 -0400 Received: from lmc.ericsson.se (lmcpc100455.pc.lmc.ericsson.se [142.133.23.150]) by LMC37.lmc.ericsson.se with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id MQM523RL; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:56:37 -0400 From: "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Peter Pentchev , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <3B20E7A3.DBC587BB@lmc.ericsson.se> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:56:35 -0400 Organization: LMC, Ericsson Research Canada X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en]C-CCK-MCD (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,fr-CA,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Bug: rmail in /bin (was: root & toor) References: <20010607212013.B4738@anarchy.com> <20010608090357.B12983@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200106081446.KAA36576@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > But yes, this is apparently a documented bug - rmail is not part of the boot > > process, there is no real need for it in 'emergency' situations when /usr > > is not mounted yet, so no, it should not really reside in /bin. > > Unfortunately, as with /etc/rmt, it is part of a protocol the > client implementations of which we do not control. IIRC, /etc/rmt is a symlink. Why not the same for rmail? $2% A. -- La sémantique est la gravité de l'abstraction. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message