From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Jun 13 22:26:23 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA20439
          for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 22:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from dyson@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA20429;
          Sat, 13 Jun 1998 22:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from dyson)
From: John Dyson <dyson>
Message-Id: <199806140526.WAA20429@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.99999?
In-Reply-To: <4.0.1.19980604174542.044f7310@mail.lariat.org> from Brett Glass at "Jun 4, 98 05:55:18 pm"
To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass)
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 22:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: dyson@iquest.net
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> How far is 3.0 away from prime time? What is the official criterion for
> deciding when it's ready to do a release? Now that it has so many things
> that 2.2.6 doesn't, is it time for a 2.9999 release based on the -current
> source tree to wring out the remaining bugs?
> 
What you are talking about had historically been a disagreement
between JKH and myself.  You might talk to jkh@freebsd.org about your
concerns.  I haven't heard many compelling arguments, other than
unfortunate expectations being set.

John
dyson@iquest.net

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message