From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 19:31:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D46A16A4CF for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:31:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB4A43D46 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:31:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j2VJVTFo004307; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:31:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.245] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)j2VJVSDJ012672; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:31:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050331212647.74d97d11.dick@nagual.st> References: <20050331212647.74d97d11.dick@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <4dd69365db659052caf239497ca31f56@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:31:27 -0500 To: dick hoogendijk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: downgrade 4.11-stable to 4.11R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:31:40 -0000 On Mar 31, 2005, at 2:26 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote: > Is it possible to go back to 4.11R if you've updated src to 4.11-stable > first and updated sthe system w/ make buildworld, install.. > > If I put the 4.11R sources back in /usr/src and do a make/build etc.. > again will my fbsd system really be 4.11R again without soem 'nasty' > traces of the update? Switch to using RELENG_4_11_RELEASE as your cvsup tag, and you can revert your sources back. You'll be missing the recent security patch, though-- using RELENG_4_11 might be better. Why do you want to revert back to the older sources? -- -Chuck