Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:48:13 +0100 From: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> To: gahr@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gegl Message-ID: <1299080893.52738.28.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <20110302152634.GF1550@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201103011706.45759.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110302075219.GA2182@reindeer.exwg.net> <20110302100645.GB2182@reindeer.exwg.net> <4D6E5691.9060906@yandex.ru> <1299077867.52738.5.camel@xenon> <20110302152634.GF1550@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:26 +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2011-Mar-02, 15:57, Michal Varga wrote: > > Out of curiosity - how is it even possible that this update made it as > > far as into ports tree, when it - at least as I understand from the PR - > > clearly doesn't work on *both* *STABLE* *supported* branches and only > > goes well with the very latest CURRENT? > > The original update doesn't cause any problems on CURRENT, > 7.4-RELEASE, or 8.2-RELEASE. It does cause problems on STABLE branches. > Is this guaranteed? As here with... > uname -a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 27 22:30:14 CET 2011 ...gegl (unpatched) still fails: exp_combine.cpp: In function 'gfloat expcombine_get_file_ev(const gchar*)': exp_combine.cpp:99: error: 'log2f' was not declared in this scope gmake[2]: *** [exp_combine-exp_combine.o] Error 1 Note that 7.4-RELEASE was back in Feb 21. Or was there a change specific to 7.4-RELEASE that for some reason didn't make it into STABLE? m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1299080893.52738.28.camel>