From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 21 07:11:04 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2C816A400
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:11:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru)
Received: from mx2.gfk.ru (mx2.gfk.ru [84.21.231.139])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699EE13C45B
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:11:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru)
Received: from ex.hhp.local by mx2.gfk.ru (MDaemon PRO v9.5.6)
	with ESMTP id md50000089812.msg
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 May 2007 11:13:35 +0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:13:32 +0400
Message-ID: <78664C02FF341B4FAC63E561846E3BCC0A10B2@ex.hhp.local>
In-Reply-To: <20070520111247.GZ23313@hoeg.nl>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade
Thread-Index: Acea0F4njRj9GDqkRP2/ofvQ0xpJnQApsgag
References: <20070518192007.6e6a91e1@kan.dnsalias.net><20070519182811.GW23313@hoeg.nl><20070520155736.59f36b67.ariff@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070520111247.GZ23313@hoeg.nl>
From: "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru>
To: "Ed Schouten" <ed@fxq.nl>
X-Spam-Processed: mx2.gfk.ru, Mon, 21 May 2007 11:13:35 +0400
	(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.0.30
X-Return-Path: Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru
X-Envelope-From: Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: current@freebsd.org
X-MDAV-Processed: mx2.gfk.ru, Mon, 21 May 2007 11:13:35 +0400
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:11:05 -0000

> * Ariff Abdullah <ariff@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > Any error messages? How about with snd_emu10kx instead of
> > snd_emu10k1 ?
>=20
> I don't get any error messages as far as I can see. snd_emu10kx does
> work. Is it worth to invest more time in this problem, better=20
> said, will
> the snd_emu10kx driver replace snd_emu10k1 in the near future?
Yes, there are some plans to do it before 7.0-RELEASE.

BTW, I was unable to repeat your problem with my cards (i386 world +
kernel built with gcc42).
Are you using i386 or amd64 kernel?

Yuriy