From owner-cvs-ports Sun Jul 27 05:54:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA03046 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 05:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA03035; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 05:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA00247; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 07:52:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sjx-ca50-19.ix.netcom.com(206.214.103.147) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma000237; Sun Jul 27 07:52:34 1997 Received: (from asami@localhost) by blimp.mimi.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) id FAA01116; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 05:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707271252.FAA01116@blimp.mimi.com> To: ache@nagual.pp.ru CC: peter@spinner.dialix.com.au, max@wide.ad.jp, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= on Sun, 27 Jul 1997 16:10:10 +0400 (MSD)) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache Makefile ports/www/apache/filesMakefile Makefile.SSL md5 md5.SSL ports/www/apache/patchespatch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-agpatch-ah ports/www/apache/patches.SSL patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac ... From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * It is better to relay on some logic in separation process rather than * just version numbers, i.e. for Apache port stable and current variants * always exists, so it is good point for splitting regardless of numbers. I see. Yes, if there are always clear-cut stable and current variants, that is probably better. * It is clear that it is separated, but not clear WHY, prefix must specify * separation reason. Well, it seems to me that people can tell that "apache-current" is separated because it is a bleeding-edge version, and "apache-ssl" is separated because it has ssl support. Doesn't that make it rather clear that "apache" is called just that because it doesn't contain either characteristics? :) Satoshi