From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 26 12:37:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B9A16D for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F256113B for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:37:05 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :JiIXek6mfvEEUpFQdo7Fj1/zg48CFjWjQv0cW+St/nW/afgnrylsiW20cS16yw== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from britannica.bec.de (ip-109-45-32-66.web.vodafone.de [109.45.32.66]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.5 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id R00ae0r3QCaODOT (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:36:24 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:36:24 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r281959 - head/usr.bin/whois Message-ID: <20150426123624.GA19390@britannica.bec.de> References: <201504250051.t3P0pitf037355@svn.freebsd.org> <20150425145149.GB25518@britannica.bec.de> <1429974286.5017.1.camel@hardenedbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1429974286.5017.1.camel@hardenedbsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:37:06 -0000 On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:04:46AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 16:51 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:51:44AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > > > Attempt to connect to alternate addresses if the connect doesn't > > > succeed in 180ms, and cut wait time between connection attempts > > > in half for each additional, if no connection was established. > > > > 180ms is very short. I have such latency over 2G, 3G and 4G most of the > > time, soo wouldn't this make whois pretty much useless on such > > connections? > > Google Chromium/Chrome uses a 300ms timeout when falling back from IPv6 > to IPv4. Maybe the 180ms timeout should be increased to match? They do the connection in parallel, don't they? Joerg