From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 22:57:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BBE16A4CE; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:57:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607D243D45; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:57:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8C30D51506; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:57:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:57:02 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Frank Laszlo Message-ID: <20050117225702.GA31708@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050117131440.2486ac2a@dolphin.local.net> <41EC175F.8060805@tvog.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41EC175F.8060805@tvog.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org cc: "Conrad J. Sabatier" cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in ports system's DISTFILES handling? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:57:03 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:51:59PM -0500, Frank Laszlo wrote: > This is quite possibly a bug. I took a lot at bsd.port.mk, and DISTFILES= =20 > is supposed to default to > ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}${EXTRACT_SUFX} Which is does, until you=20 > "append" something else to it, exactly what you are trying to do. Other= =20 > ports I'm looking at simply define the DISTFILES below the MASTER_SITE.= =20 > This is going to cause a warning in portlint, but hey.. what can ya do.= =20 > I'm going to investigate further. Hope this was helpful. I don't think it's a bug, you're just trying to do something you can't do (mix DISTFILES with the "implicit" DISTFILES value computed by bsd.port.mk). If you want to use a custom list of distfiles, define them *all* explicitly. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB7EK+Wry0BWjoQKURAo9dAKC1edGsAaSnIqJ8dA1Dbz44Vqy6tQCglXuc Qnv7iuTW5TNVMQS+q30W1sk= =pbMy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--