From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 14 14:58:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA54337B64A; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:58:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA15073; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:58:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:58:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Igor Roshchin Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openssl-0.95a creates /usr/local/openssl/man In-Reply-To: <200008141356.JAA14480@giganda.komkon.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Igor Roshchin wrote: > May be the package should add /usr/local/man to the system-wide MANPATH ? > If not - may be there is some other solution? > At the very least, there should be a note that appears on the screen at the end > of the output from "make install" that would warn that the man pages > are in a different location. This is probably the best solution. > Otherwise, if one assumes that this port follows the general convention > will never find those man pages... :) > > As for the OpenSSL in 4.0 - I still can not find the man pages for the > OpenSSl that became a part of the base system. As I said earlier: > It's the same reason we dont install the manpages by default for the > version of OpenSSL in the base system. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message