From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 22 07:48:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7830D16A4CE; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:48:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from v6.hitachi.co.jp (galilei.v6.hitachi.co.jp [133.145.167.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2D743D46; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from suz@crl.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from flora210w.uki-uki.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by v6.hitachi.co.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9M6gRRt061248; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:42:29 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from suz@crl.hitachi.co.jp) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:42:18 +0900 Message-ID: From: SUZUKI Shinsuke To: molter@tin.it X-cite: xcite 1.33 In-Reply-To: <20041021213248.223cab2c.molter@tin.it> References: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org> <20041021153933.GK13756@empiric.icir.org> <4177E25E.804639E@freebsd.org> <20041021213248.223cab2c.molter@tin.it> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.32 (Wonderwall) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Network Systems Research Dept., Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd, Japan MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: andre@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:48:01 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:32:48 +0200 >>>>> molter@tin.it(Marco Molteni) said: > SCTP in KAME is complete, stable and fully supported. > It is mainly developed by the SCTP RFC author, Randall Stewart. KAME Project haven't received SCTP-related bug report so much, and I think it's due to a lack of testers, SCTP-API standard, and SCTP-ready applications. #Sometimes KAME SNAP compilation fails in SCTP and non-SCTP #application fails in compilation due to a change by SCTP. So it's #difficult to conclude that SCTP is already stable... So I'm not still sure if SCTP in KAME is complete and stable enough to merge into -current. (If someone can contribute to this kind of evaluation, it's quite appreciated, of course!) Thanks, ---- SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project