From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 12 0:37:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from corp2.cbn.net.id (corp2.cbn.net.id [202.158.3.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D7537B405 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:37:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@office.naver.co.id) Received: from dante.naver.co.id (unknown [202.158.86.173]) by corp2.cbn.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id E716D66C40 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:37:39 +0700 (JAVT) Received: by dante.naver.co.id (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0B4CBDF48; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:37:45 +0700 (JAVT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:37:45 +0700 From: John Indra To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No more snapshots of -CURRENT? Message-ID: <20010712143745.B83008@office.naver.co.id> Mail-Followup-To: Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20010712135034.A83008@office.naver.co.id> <20010712020833.G2449@sneakerz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010712020833.G2449@sneakerz.org>; from bright@sneakerz.org on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 02:08:34AM -0500 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i on FreeBSD 5.0-20010210-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 02:08:34AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> newer i386 snapshots then 20010618. Does it mean -CURRENT is in no "stable" >> condition right now? >current is never "stable", if you want stable stil with -stable. :) I KNOW. That's why I put double quotes around the stable word from the first place ;) The first intention was just to ask why aren't there newer snapshots then 20010618. I am thinking of installing newest snapshots on my PC. Thanks anyway... /john Live Free OR Die To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message