From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Apr 4 23:27:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA00548 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 23:27:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from aztec.co.za (aztec.co.za [196.7.70.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA00541 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 23:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pcmgate.pcm.co.za [196.3.254.241] by aztec.co.za with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0u55uU-000apSC; Fri, 5 Apr 96 09:26 EET Received: (from ishort@localhost) by pcmgate.pcm.co.za (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA03470; Fri, 5 Apr 1996 09:19:10 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 09:19:10 +0200 (SAT) From: Irvine Short To: Bruce Evans cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio2: 65 events for device with no tp In-Reply-To: <199604041326.XAA14205@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 4 Apr 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: Bruce, Thanks for the reply below. It explains my problem, but what is the tp that my device is without? Regarding the bit about IRQ7, could I now safely put a network card or whatever on it, or should I first find a lpt port that does not cause bogus interrupts? > >What is this message? > > >I have just compiled a kernel with support for an ARNET 8 port serial > >card with 8 16450 ports in it. > > The device interrupted (although device interrupts are supposed to be > disabled) before any of the ports were opened. Probably after they > were configured. The message should go away after the ports have > been opened at least ones. The driver won't know what to do with the > interrupts, but it will know they aren't for it, and it will quietly > ignore them. Try dummy opens (stty -f /dev/ttyd[0-9]).