From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 23 21:53:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 19CE816A4CE; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:53:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net
	[63.251.155.133])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8379C43D31; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:53:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from chris@sigd.net)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:52:47 -0400
Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC220228C04A@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: KDE Front End for mPlayer
Thread-Index: AcS5RYPTd6uzl9DVQ2agaAbPJWqGCAAAxBXg
From: "Haulmark, Chris" <chris@sigd.net>
To: "Michael Nottebrock" <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>,
	<freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org>
cc: Nathan Alan Souer <nate@nathansouer.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: KDE Front End for mPlayer
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:53:06 -0000

Someone broke the silence:=20

> On Friday, 22. October 2004 05:50, Haulmark, Chris wrote:
>=20
>> Do not include the version number when you use either pkg_update or
>> portupgrade.  Instead, just do like this:
>>=20
>> pkg_update openldap
>> portupgrade openldap
>>=20
>> If there are more than one versions, it'll ask you yes or no for each
>> version.
>=20
> This is simply wrong (for openldap*). Please try out your suggestions
> yourself before mailing them...

Of course, those were intended to be an example of how to eliminate the =
use of version numbers as part of the given arg to either tools.

pkg_update was my only mistake as it is removed.  pkg_add is what I =
meant.

Perhaps, it would been best for you to point out that there are several =
different openldap packages instead of opting to respond and correct my =
lack of explanations considering the fact there are different openldap =
packages available.

--
Chris Haulmark
System Admin. Freelancer
"In market for IT corrections for a salary."