From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 13:52:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B94EC88A; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FC501D8; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-8-230-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.230.52] helo=damnhippie.dyndns.org) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLvCE-000A1z-7N; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:52:18 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s27DqFrK052142; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:52:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 24.8.230.52 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18B/tGzgsguymLLGEZx/nOf Subject: option NEW_PCIB From: Ian Lepore To: freebsd-arch , freebsd-arm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 06:52:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1394200335.1149.370.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:52:19 -0000 Every architecture has "option NEW_PCIB" in its conf/DEFAULTS except arm and mips. Is that on purpose? What are the implications of adding it? Or maybe more importantly, what are the implications of it not being there? -- Ian