Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:51:19 -0400 From: enoch <ixew@hotmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable Message-ID: <87vclfwqp4.fsf@hotmail.com> References: <20120330233819.GC7325@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F75C5EC.6090303@hotmail.com> <20120402195215.GA3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <jlblna$ptp$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120403023225.GD3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87ty11670b.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120403183521.GA7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87obr95pxh.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120403225422.GB7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87sjgk5czo.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120404210445.GB10911@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>> Recently it became extremely difficult to pass the DHCP discovery step >> >> >> >> >>>> on boot. Now I am using the buggy [nve] instead. >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Can anyone help? >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Did you set synchronous_dhclient option in rc.conf? >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes: ifconfig_nfe0="SYNCDHCP" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I guess [nfe] is undergoing gradual devel changes of some sort as before >> >> >> >> >> it had some chance of reporting "empty headers" on initial ifconfig and >> >> >> >> >> refusing to work. Sorry, I should have reported when encountering the >> >> >> >> >> first problems rather than solve by reboot. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Would you show me the output of both dmesg(nfe(4) and its PHY only) >> >> >> >> > and 'sysctl dev.nfe.0.stats'? >> >> >> >> > It would be also helpful to know whether nfe(4) still sees >> >> >> >> > incoming traffic. >> >> >> >> > Does assigning static IP work? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Static IP direct communication attempt from this desktop to another >> >> >> >> laptop through a crossover cable fails as follows. Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> >> >> >> options=82008<VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> >> >> >> >> ether 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc >> >> >> >> inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 >> >> >> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT >> >> >> >> <full-duplex,flowcontrol,master,rxpause,txpause>) >> >> >> >> status: active >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP >> >> >> >> nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce 430 MCP13 Networking Adapter> port 0xf200-0xf207 >> >> >> >> mem 0xefffb000-0xefffbfff irq 21 at device 20.0 on pci0 >> >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > It seems you've omitted PHY driver here. What PHY driver was >> >> >> > attached to nfe(4)? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 >> >> >> rgephy1: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc >> >> >> >> nfe0: [FILTER] >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.frame_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.extra_bytes: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.late_cols: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.runts: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.jumbos: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fifo_overuns: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.crc_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fae: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.len_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.unicast: 56 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.multicast: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.broadcast: 280 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.octets: 7517 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.zero_rexmits: 51 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.one_rexmits: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.multi_rexmits: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.late_cols: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.fifo_underuns: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.carrier_losts: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.excess_deferrals: 0 >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.retry_errors: 0 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks. Would you show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv"? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> nfe0@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x068000 card=0x10003842 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 >> >> >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' >> >> >> device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' >> >> >> class = bridge >> >> >> bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xefffb000, size 4096, enabled >> >> >> bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf200, size 8, enabled >> >> >> cap 01[44] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 >> >> >> >> >> >> Interestingly, now that nfe0 is using a static IP it sometimes boots >> >> >> up properly. Are you interested in its good working? >> >> > >> >> > Yes I am. Would you try attached patch and let me know whether the >> >> > patch makes any difference on your box? >> >> >> >> Sorry to report: The patch was applied (to 8-stable latest code) but out >> >> of 3 boots only one succeeded. Same stream of "nfe0: discard frame w/o >> >> leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0)" messages. >> > >> > Ok, back out previous patch and try attached one. >> >> With these two patch files applied to the 8-stable code, buildkernel >> fails as follows. >> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c: In function 'nfe_attach': >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:630: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_model' >> *** Error code 1 >> > > Oops, sorry I forgot that this part of change was not merged to > stable/8. I've attached a minimal patch which would be cleanly > applied to stable/8. Wasn't the attached diff3 already included in diff2? Seems to me the wrong file was attached this time. Please advise. > >> Sorry, I can't handle 9-stable. Enoch. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87vclfwqp4.fsf>