From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 9 19:13:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from krycek.zoominternet.net (krycek.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4490537B422 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 7340 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 02:12:43 -0000 Received: from acs-24-154-35-235.zoominternet.net (HELO cvzoom.net) (24.154.35.235) by krycek.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 10 Apr 2001 02:12:43 -0000 Message-ID: <3AD26C2D.CD7049F0@cvzoom.net> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:13:01 -0400 From: Donn Miller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Emmerton Cc: Conrad Sabatier , Bob K , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: supfile idea (was Re: Releases) References: <008901c0c162$8a684960$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Emmerton wrote: > I like the idea of stable-supfile, so it should stay. standard-supfile > should *definitely* refer to the -REL in which it is a part of. In that > case, a novice user who doesn't change anything would end up cvsup'ing code > that they already have on their system or on CD - no harm done. Personally, I think "standard-supfile" should be renamed "current-supfile", because it cvsups -current. Also, put some kind of warning in there that states you are about to cvsup an unstable, untested development version of FreeBSD. I think unstable-supfile is another good possibility. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message