From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 5 01:47:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA00401 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA00391 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id SAA27621 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 18:17:29 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199708050847.SAA27621@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Registry reviewers? To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 18:17:29 +0930 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Do I take it that nobody has actually looked at the registry code (documented, commented for Steven's delectation) that I mentioned last week? If I were to just slip it in parallel with the sysctl code, would anyone notice? 8) Seriously, please, even just a style bitch would be nice... -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[