From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 20 04:47:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586F616A4CE for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (mail.gddsn.org.cn [210.21.6.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36BE43D46 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 04:47:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wsk@gddsn.org.cn) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (unknown [211.96.21.195]) by gddsn.org.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4A38CBE2; Thu, 20 May 2004 19:47:05 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <40AC9AB7.6070109@gddsn.org.cn> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 19:47:03 +0800 From: wsk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; zh-CN; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040409 X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith , net@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:47:18 -0000 Ian Smith : >Define the wiring of null-modem cable? DTR (tied to DSR) asserts CD the >other end, either way? RTS asserts CTS the other end, either way? > > > > > The behavour is intentional. > > Your cable doesn't supply DCD signal. > >Or it does, but RTS/CTS aren't wired right? (if used .. so many options!) > > > Either use a cable with DCD suport or stay with cuaa. > > It's OK to use cuaa if you don't need dialout support. > >Still depends on how cuaa0 and ttyd1 are defined, no? > >Cheers, Ian > > > > yep,It's my null-modem cable's probem O:-) ,and it works excellents with another null-modem!thanks again!