From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 20 9:18:26 2000 From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 09:18:24 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from updraft.jp.freebsd.org (updraft.jp.FreeBSD.ORG [210.157.158.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E62737B402 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by updraft.jp.freebsd.org (8.11.1+3.4W/8.11.1) with ESMTP/inet id eBKHIG844354 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:18:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) X-Face: '*aj"d@ijeQ:/X}]oM5c5Uz{ZZZk90WPt>a^y4$cGQp8:!H\W=hSM;PuNiidkc]/%,;6VGu e+`&APmz|P;F~OL/QK%;P2vU>\j4X.8@i%j6[%DTs_3J,Fff0)*oHg$A.cDm&jc#pD24WK@{,"Ef!0 P\):.2}8jo-BiZ?X&t$V X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.2 (Peisino,Ak(B) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 10 From: Makoto MATSUSHITA To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Why 'lnc.ko' instead of 'if_lnc.ko' ? Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:18:01 +0900 Message-Id: <20001221021801G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Recently, we have a module of 'lnc' ethernet. Maybe it's the last ethernet driver converted to newbus framework IIRC. Very thank you. However, this kernel module is named as 'lnc.ko'. Other ethernet driver modules are named as 'if_XXX.ko'; why lnc doesn't obey this name convension? Typo, or a new name scheme is used instead? -- - Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message