From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 26 06:05:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E426C16A401; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604EA43D45; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3Q65qnS066517; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:05:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k3Q65qUI066514; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:05:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:05:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <444F0D58.9020000@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20060425230508.X66143@ns1.feral.com> References: <444E7750.206@samsco.org> <200604251540.00170.jhb@freebsd.org> <444E7BFE.4040800@samsco.org> <20060425.173236.74726638.imp@bsdimp.com> <444EB6A1.3060901@samsco.org> <20060426103623.M1847@epsplex.bde.org> <20060425223519.F65802@ns1.feral.com> <444F0923.8050508@samsco.org> <20060425224750.K65869@ns1.feral.com> <444F0D58.9020000@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Matthew Jacob , Warner Losh Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/bce if_bcereg.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 06:05:57 -0000 > And actually, it's 100% impossible to do a transfer larger than 2^32 on > PCI Express due to the protocol requiring that a transfer not cross a > 4GB boundary. You could still have a device that you program with > 2^32 and it'll take care of the segment issues. > So, I think that we are pretty safe with this typedef for > the next 5-10 years. Nope. I give it 3 years max. > Of course, I'll be honored when Linus calls me a > moron for this 7 years from now =-) > > Scott > >