From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec 23 13:42:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA11776
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 13:42:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA10993
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 13:37:27 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [204.141.95.138]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA08284 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 16:42:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971223164023.00ddb910@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 16:40:24 -0500
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: de? driver working
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


I installed Matt Thomas's v1.7 netbsd driver with a 21140-AC chip
board and it autodetects and works like a charm....I'm wondering
why someone doesnt commit this (rather than the crappy one in
the tree now).


Its very concerning (seeing all the subject matter being discussed
in hackers) that noone cares that a fundamental driver (one that
USED to be highly recommended) doesnt work.

Dennis