From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Sep  4 14:26:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA24290
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 14:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA24285
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 14:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.5/8.6.6) id OAA01409; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 14:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 14:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
Message-Id: <199709042126.OAA01409@kithrup.com>
To: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "Jordan K. Hubbard": http://techweb.cmp.com/internetwk/reviews/rev0901-3.htm
References: <1482.873391917@time.cdrom.com>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In article <199709042101.OAA20160.kithrup.freebsd.chat@foo.primenet.com> you write:
>The other thing about GENERIC (and to be honest, something which
>leaves me somewhat awed with the results for "100 users") is that
>GENERIC has maxusers set to 10, which seems to be even more
>significant than the 64MB memory limitation.

Hm.  That kinda matches with BSDi declaring that an httpd user is 1/10th of
a real user.  (Same with NFS and ftpd.)

So 100 httpd users would be 10 real users.