Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:59:44 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Thomas Valentino Crimi <tcrimi+@andrew.cmu.edu> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk> Subject: Re: Critical (or equivalent) section in Userland? Message-ID: <20000817175944.A41839@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <Utb0d7S00UwAMI3bU2@andrew.cmu.edu>; from tcrimi%2B@andrew.cmu.edu on Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 11:52:39AM -0400 References: <399BA212.A84240AE@tdx.co.uk> <Utb0d7S00UwAMI3bU2@andrew.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 11:52:39AM -0400, Thomas Valentino Crimi wrote: > Take a look at rtprio(2), giving yourself a realtime priority will > guarantee you the CPU until you explicitly release it (or another higher > priority realtime process comes along). I'd assume it is possible that one of the renames might block, resulting in some other process being scheduled. This would certainly be possible over NFS. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000817175944.A41839>