From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 10 7:33:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from lambic.physics.montana.edu (lambic.physics.montana.edu [153.90.192.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9C4151BA for ; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 07:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu) Received: from localhost (handy@localhost) by lambic.physics.montana.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA97373; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 08:33:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 08:33:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Brian Handy To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 8bpp exepected in some ports In-Reply-To: <38001F9E.E5169B9C@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Message-ID: X-files: The truth is out there MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I noticed that some ports like felt and femlab expect 8bpp and won't >display correctly under 16bpp. emiclock also seems to have a similar >problem. Is this a bug in X or should I try to fix these utilities ? I believe Xanim also has this problem. Some things work fine in 16bpp, so I'm not convinced this is an X bug! (Though...like I know the first thing about X programming.) If you see a systemmatic problem, maybe we can feed some patches back to the authors. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message