From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 9 21:05:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA10055 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 21:05:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA10020 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 21:05:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA11085; Sun, 10 May 1998 00:05:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 00:05:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199805100405.AAA11085@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu Subject: Multicast, routed, 224.0.0.0, etc. In-Reply-To: <3551e43e.58668304@mail.cetlink.net> References: <3551e43e.58668304@mail.cetlink.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < What if you have two ethernet interfaces? Will router discovery > packets be sent out to both interfaces when the 224.0.0.0 static > default route points to only one of them? No. The expectation is that you don't have multiple interfaces. This ought to be easy to remedy, and may even be fixed in more recent versions of routed (somewhere buried in this INBOX I have a message from Vern advising me of a new release). However, it would require `routed' to have multiple interface-specific sockets open while running the discovery protocol. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message