From owner-freebsd-scsi Sun Jan 26 12:21:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA21866 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 12:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA21852 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id VAA06605 for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 21:20:38 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.4/8.6.9) id UAA07131; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:56:24 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:56:24 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tape Backup Drive Not working. References: <10798.199701260129@pitcairn.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> <199701261907.VAA25206@zeta.fidata.fi> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199701261907.VAA25206@zeta.fidata.fi>; from Tomi Vainio on Jan 26, 1997 21:07:55 +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Tomi Vainio wrote: (Thanks for the feedback!) > > for the older 5099?). Does anybody have experiences with the Wangtek > > 5525ES? Does it claim to be SCSI-2 or SCSI-1? > > > (bt0:2:0): "WANGTEK 5525ES SCSI 70Z" type 1 removable SCSI 2 > st0(bt0:2:0): Sequential-Access density code 0x0, drive empty Hmm, i assume that's already one of the newer drives? > I have used this one since FreeBSD 2.0 and it has always worked > without any problems. Of course, but that wasn't my question. The question was whether it would continue to work with the PF bit set. Since your drive claims SCSI-2 conformance, it must work then. Anybody around with older drives? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)