Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 23:31:16 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Jameel Akari <jakari@bithose.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0-RC2 on Alphaserver 4100 mostly a success Message-ID: <20021226233116.A42240@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20021226222053.GO5201@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>; from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au on Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:20:53AM %2B1100 References: <20021226162035.I19983-100000@blues.jpj.net> <Pine.OSF.4.33.0212261656510.28837-100000@poptart.bithose.com> <20021226230635.A42090@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20021226222053.GO5201@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:20:53AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2002-Dec-26 23:06:35 +0100, Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 05:04:31PM -0500, Jameel Akari wrote: > >> I think some DE500s have problems going at 100/full even on a > >> proper 100Mbit switch.. > ... > > > >IIRC the various chip revs used on DE500 are not all working too well > >with FDX. > > You don't happen to have any details on which chip revs are affected? > In real life, I keep an eye on several dozen DE500's all running > 100/full (with Tru64 4.x) and haven't seen any problems that look like > poor network throughput. Hm, unfortunately not. I was told by a guy who used to do benchmarking on T64. ISTR it also depended on what ethernet switches one used. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021226233116.A42240>