From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 20 02:33:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6249016A4B3; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 02:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 71BF143FDF; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 02:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9K9X2E7008590;
	Mon, 20 Oct 2003 03:33:02 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 03:30:56 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20031020.033056.24857330.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031019221341.GA32851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20031019204629.GC49466@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<3F92FC99.8010802@freebsd.org>
	<20031019221341.GA32851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: re@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: kris@obsecurity.org
Subject: Re: __fpclassifyd problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:33:04 -0000

In message: <20031019221341.GA32851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
            Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
: I sent in an email *along time ago* about this type 
: of problem.  See the fallout due to revision 1.24
: of lib/libc/stdio/findfp.c.  IMHO, all shared libraries
: versions should have been bumped in going from 4.x to
: 5.0. 

I tend to agree due to some weirdness that forced the libc bump.
However, this would then have to includ all ports libraries too.
Bumping all ports libraries and having a viable ports system that
built on both 4.x and 5.x would then become nightmarish because you'd
not want to bump them on 4.x.

Warner