Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 08:39:42 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Per_Hallstr=F6m_NV98ATe?= <Per_Hallstrom_NV98ATe@teknikum.vaxjo.se> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: load average, to small to be true.. Message-ID: <20001014083941.A272@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <msg116309.thr-1ddab70.4c5018@kungsmadskolan.se>; from Per_Hallstrom_NV98ATe@teknikum.vaxjo.se on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 04:00:38PM %2B0200 References: <msg116309.thr-1ddab70.4c5018@kungsmadskolan.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Per Hallström NV98ATe <Per_Hallstrom_NV98ATe@teknikum.vaxjo.se> [001014 06:57] wrote: > It seems I'm the only one that has discovered that FreeBSD (i have > tried up to 4.1-RELEASE) dosen't want the load to be more than 1024, or > maybe the only one that thinks it's annoying.. =) Why? > > I know FreeBSD can run more processes than that - I have tried with > about 7000, running at the same time... too bad I can't see an > impressive load average... > > It can't be that much extra work for the kernel to hold just some extra > bits to support load averages that is far beyond reality, can it? You probably want to rase maxusers in your kernel config. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001014083941.A272>