From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 30 15:43:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rfnj.org (rfnj.org [216.239.237.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D2037B401 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:43:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from all@biosys.net) Received: from megalomaniac.biosys.net (megalomaniac.rfnj.org [216.239.237.200]) by rfnj.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE2813ADE for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:20:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010830181608.00bd4df0@rfnj.org> X-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:20:14 -0400 To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Allen Landsidel Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-01:58.lpd In-Reply-To: <20010830123948.A23605@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010830153246.K69164-100000@mail.wlcg.com> <200108301915.f7UJFv735421@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010830153246.K69164-100000@mail.wlcg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 12:39 8/30/2001 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: ....ems Is there some reason in particular that some of you (picks Kris out of the crowd for being closest) choose to use MIME attachments for your text-only messages instead of just wrapping a normal text/plain message? This question has been digging in my head for a while and I figured I'd finally ask it outloud. Some people do it the (imho) proper way, and I applaud them. MIME attachments aren't really needed unless there is going to be binary data in the attachment. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBO468Ho06eIXREedLEQJs9ACgtCghgRtTPRQw7IAUOmVSRcg+2jAAn1Ig 20CcmHoyZPBE+6dHtlOOgNry =NIEI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message