From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 22 5:21:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pa.scotland.net (pa1.scotland.net [194.247.64.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910814D8F for ; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 05:21:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@timog.prestel.co.uk) Received: from [148.176.237.140] (helo=timog.prestel.co.uk) by pa.scotland.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #4) id 11TlP8-0003wM-00 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 13:21:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 11857 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Sep 1999 06:56:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 07:56:55 +0100 From: Timo Geusch To: Peter Wemm Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ep0 etherlink III breakage Message-ID: <19990922075655.A11837@tabby.timog.prestel.co.uk> References: <19990922024022.421791CA7@overcee.netplex.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <19990922024022.421791CA7@overcee.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 10:40:22AM +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 10:40:22AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > No, it's better to remove "device ep0 at isa ? port foo irq blah ..." etc > and just have "device ep0" *only*. If the pnp code finds it, let it use > pnp to configure it. Does it do that by now? About two or three months ago it didn't and I started writing the necessary code. Now I'm just learning how to remotely debug the kernel... Cheers, Timo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message