From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 2 14:54:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D137816A465; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7A243D45; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j72EqSDF027151; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 08:52:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:53:24 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050802.085324.113101750.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <86d5owikzx.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050802090717.GK14023@ip.net.ua> <20050802140536.zstn68rcgsg84g0w@netchild.homeip.net> <86d5owikzx.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:52:29 -0600 (MDT) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, netchild@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, ru@FreeBSD.ORG, grehan@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc src/share/man/man7 build.7 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:54:12 -0000 In message: <86d5owikzx.fsf@xps.des.no> des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: : Alexander Leidinger writes: : > Warner said it's unlikely that someone will use this feature in a c= ross-arch : > situation (at least I did understand it this way), so what about wa= iting : > until we get user-feedback for this case? : = : Just because Warner doesn't need this feature doesn't mean nobody els= e : does. I didn't say I didn't need this feature. I suggested it might be relatively rare that someone uses it in cross-arch cases. Besides, it will do the right thing if we use TARGET_ARCH. Warner