From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 14 10:01:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA02990 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 10:01:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sdcc10.ucsd.edu (sdcc10.ucsd.edu [132.239.50.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA02985 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 10:00:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crouilla@ucsd.edu) Received: from localhost (crouilla@localhost) by sdcc10.ucsd.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id KAA09242; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 10:00:36 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: sdcc10.ucsd.edu: crouilla owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 10:00:36 -0800 (PST) From: Chuck Rouillard Reply-To: chuck@ucsd.edu To: Ben Goodwin cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Ben Goodwin Subject: Re: Sendmail segfaults; can't bind to socket; won't restart! In-Reply-To: <199811141643.LAA12737@acestes-fe0.ultra.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [snip] > I'd been running the may 3.0 snapshot for some time just fine. Recently > sendmail and a few other programs decided to start dying on me with sig > 10's and 11's ... so I decided to upgrade. I did a fresh install (wiped ^^^^^^^^^^^ Although not always, sig 11 is more often than not hardware. Since you say "...and a few other programs decided to start dying on me..." this seems to reinforce the possibility 'sendmail' has no problem per se. Moreover, the system as a whole as been running "...for some time..". [snip] > Also of interest, I have no other problems (yet, at least) with any other > programs on the machine. It's only sendmail. This is a slight contradiction. :) > -=| Ben > -chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message