Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Apr 1999 20:07:04 -0700
From:      Michael Haro <mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us>
To:        "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Time to split the ports collection?
Message-ID:  <19990417200704.A81975@patrol.area51.fremont.ca.us>
In-Reply-To: <371935DD.A3B70644@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>; from Pedro F. Giffuni on Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 08:31:11PM -0500
References:  <371935DD.A3B70644@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 08:31:11PM -0500, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> The fact is that since the ports system is now on /usr/ports/Mk, and
> these files are not available by default, nor are they on the live
> filesystem , I had to start installing the complete ports tree and when
> sysinstall finished installing the /usr/ports/Mk dir, I abruptly stopped
> the installation with Ctrl-C. There clearly has to be a different way of
> installing the base files, either a "base port tools" package should be
> added, or the ports distribution should be installable by branches like
> src is.

That is the reason we have upgrade kits at
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/.  The upgrade kits take care of fixing
everything which needs fixing since the release you installed.

Michael


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990417200704.A81975>