From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Mar 12 3:15:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net (finch-post-10.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E16937BDD7 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 03:14:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from nlsys.demon.co.uk ([158.152.125.33] helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12U6Jx-0008Sp-0A; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 11:14:06 +0000 Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14685; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 11:20:54 GMT (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 11:16:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson To: Bernd Walter Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64bit address space on alpha In-Reply-To: <20000312112132.A75380@cicely8.cicely.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Bernd Walter wrote: > Just to get you informed about this point: > It was completely my fault and it took me realy a half year to recheck and > find this stupid thing :( > I put (128*1024*1024*1024) in config following the example in LINT. > The point is that gcc uses an int to calculate the number behind. > Now that I'm using a constant everything is fine... Good. Thanks for checking this out. You might have been able to try something like (128*1024*1024*1024L) to force gcc to use the right types for its arithmetic. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message