From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 15:48:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482F7AAF5C3 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2872517EB for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 25EAFAAF5C2; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257D2AAF5C0 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E015A17EA; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x21so41002002oix.2; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:48:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h6x1qVZ5xUf3nPnrMKvo8LL+FH3HN1/rrys0VqkqIWc=; b=snE23T9RX9evVGOtStGEN4PH+SvEcv3VhMA+791Ug+J4qB3yD6HSnqx6nu+hwfBMoN hYap5AWKc0UmlAWz7b5CfQwOdvPsw0ZNB42gKoOOcmHnMaK6RDwIYTWPk42hbJga/M2K ujX8mNS1c+aHwG+uqfFYPrUx824rx/dxhnOGXJyHjVoVw5p74rV6qua7JkSrgoSXfNnv SxhX5gnOEjEfEt7Qj8MCQsJhfkutc+Oq1oq9pw1P6msl9m2/t5U6TeYfvVFNL63wv+mV l64pgOclUf0KqtZrDxhfBmdk4G3at+W6afctLqGA0OjFl2gmk7PyS0hZFxbk2Ywiclp0 fweQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h6x1qVZ5xUf3nPnrMKvo8LL+FH3HN1/rrys0VqkqIWc=; b=eGAtfzkMW9nkv4oEvq8QRSBCY8xg/ZyxKIT4+3mm4INj6cF2tBXpWWedySQzF7OOjF yzPg2ApPAPIlR4yZ3s7UMJs6hQm1pPI9DZ1pSZ9AHUOhwxR4YqtTdHP5e2TaRrILXW1k mvbxoy98OKosF7cVz5+7k8/O2tY4NaxvRFeUXF8e5dHVfwzBrLDiLYRGGZldqmCWHdAE nH9WlhRaooUmBghXqbendhpxNoTsRlAWw6H1BCIT7Zh77/KsOBIRq/vzhuqMgprN1Crf wgoz/upSNInu8PIZTJx+4xlxl24lRhCx1n7U72aUZqOyAeliSrnw+iUG37eM9cTfyKe+ Wz4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQxc/JzGc0qauY38s8JdMMj5WYoBPlooFFjIubFHubSu/qtIRtltsOuObuvj1RWeHAawsd1jzxaG+WSNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.102.214 with SMTP id m83mr19390667oik.74.1456069692976; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:48:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com Received: by 10.60.6.202 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:48:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160220223655.GA86662@chd.heemeyer.club> References: <86mvqxlvr3.fsf@desk.des.no> <20160220223655.GA86662@chd.heemeyer.club> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 16:48:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TCTylks-4GypcmYB0lMewhg8o4o Message-ID: Subject: Re: CVE-2015-7547 and linux-f10-* ports? From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= To: Chagin Dmitry Cc: "Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav" , emulation@freebsd.org, Johannes Meixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:48:14 -0000 2016-02-20 23:36 GMT+01:00 Chagin Dmitry : > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:27:12PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: >> Ren?? Ladan writes: >> > in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security vulnerabilities, >> > is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* ports? >> >> I don't think we can just svn rm them. IIRC, c6 doesn't work with a >> stock FreeBSD 9 kernel. We would have to issue an EN to update the >> Linuxulator. I'm not sure how much work is involved. >> > does we have 9.4 plans? if so, I will merge Linuxulator to the stable/9. I don't think there are plans for a 9.4-RELEASE. But xmj@ confirmed on the other thread that linux-c6 at least builds fine on 9.3-RELEASE with the compat.linux.osrelease sysctl bumped to 2.6.32 (not sure if all functionality is there in that case). Regards, Ren=C3=A9 --=20 https://.rene-ladan.nl/