Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:07:45 -0400
From:      Robert Noland <rnoland@2hip.net>
To:        yousif@alumni.jmu.edu
Cc:        x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new emerald in ports (0.5.2) + beryl = problem?
Message-ID:  <1189721265.13714.12.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com>
In-Reply-To: <1189718884.1358.55.camel@localhost>
References:  <1189718884.1358.55.camel@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-d2vUDbtGV03WjXprhMlK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:28 -0400, Yousif Hassan wrote:
> Hey all:
>=20
> I took the "chance" of upgrading emerald to 0.5.2 - I'm pretty sure this
> new port revision is in there to eventually support compiz-fusion, which
> is also at 0.5.2 since emerald is now part of that.  However, there's
> still a dependency on emerald from the beryl port - and the beryl port
> hasn't moved!

The beryl port will not move, in fact it will go away very soon.  You
need to be moving to compiz.  All of the relevant parts are in the tree
now.  The 0.6.0 version of compiz-fusion is due any day now.

> To wit, if you're using Beryl, as I am, there seems to be a problem.
> The new 0.5.2 Emerald decorator doesn't work.  I know what the problem
> is, but I can't seem to solve it:
>=20
> beryl: decoration: property ignored because version is 20070319 and
> decoration plugin version is 20061011

The 0.5.2 version of emerald will not work with beryl, at least not that
I am aware of.  The 20070319 version is from the new emerald, the
20061011 version is from libdecoration.so (beryl plugin).

robert.

> 20070319 certainly makes sense since this is a new version of emerald,
> but even after updating x11-themes/emerald-themes, I can't get the
> decorations to load.
>=20
> Is there another module that should be made a dependency that I need to
> update/install?  Or is the problem beryl (in which case, it may or may
> not get fixed there...?)
>=20
> I'm sure this will be sorted out eventually, I just wanted to get the
> ball rolling in case this problem has not been discovered yet.
>=20
> Thanks.
> Yousif
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

--=-d2vUDbtGV03WjXprhMlK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBG6bRvM4TrQ4qfROMRAvnTAJ40aQNjphD6+QcNqOoL7KNz7aiy5wCdENpm
nkR9Xx5gHm1iBsGuwrKGUpI=
=QbnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-d2vUDbtGV03WjXprhMlK--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1189721265.13714.12.camel>