From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 21 14:26:31 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA29542 for current-outgoing; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:26:31 -0700 Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA29521 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:25:09 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA00831; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:23:08 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199509212123.OAA00831@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: rmail and brain-dead mail systems .. patch enclosed To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 14:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Cc: dk+@ua.net, pst@shockwave.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199509211738.TAA16378@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Sep 21, 95 07:38:23 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 751 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > As Dmitry Kohmanyuk wrote: > > > > I also think sendmail can do the rmail's job, but possibly worser. > > Not worse. It does it as well, i've once been using it since it had > to work in an environment where some mails didn't have the From_ line > above, but rmail insists on it (for no good reason). You all do realize that our rmail sources come with sendmail: RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/rmail/rmail.c,v Working file: rmail.c head: 1.6 branch: locks: strict access list: symbolic names: v8_6_12: 1.1.1.1 And if you have problems with rmail they should be sent to Eric... -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD