From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 15:53:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D090F16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:53:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF8743D41 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:53:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAJFt1VL098840; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:55:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAJFt1Ke098839; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:55:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:55:01 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20041119155501.GA98748@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Kirk Strauser , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200411190917.51162.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411190917.51162.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,J_CHICKENPOX_21 autolearn=failed version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on ei.bzerk.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/mountcritremote and nfsserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:53:09 -0000 On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 09:17:47AM -0600, Kirk Strauser typed: > > As someone new to the whole rc.d idea, I have to ask: is it OK to add > `nfsserver' to the REQUIRE line in `mountcritremote'? Is there any reason > not to? Would this make sense as a patch for FreeBSD in general? Since 'mountcritremote' is in the REQUIRE line of 'nfsserver', that would create a loop. I think in your case though you can savely replace the 'mountcritremote' requirement in nfsserver by 'mountcritlocal'. Then you can add nfsserver to the REQUIRE line in `mountcritremote' BTW, this obviously won't work if you plan to re-export remote nfs-shares > -- > Kirk Strauser