Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:03:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191713] [new port] net/p5-Net-RabbitFoot - Synchronous interface to AnyEvent::RabbitMQ Message-ID: <bug-191713-13-VcGWdNSW9a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191713-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191713-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191713 --- Comment #5 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- I'm really happy that the effort wasn't wasted as it resulted in an updated patch. However, this log seems that it's missing the QA tests, which look something like: =========================================================================== ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist ===> Checking for directories owned by MTREEs ===> Checking for directories handled by dependencies ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) ====>> Checking for staging violations... done =========================================================================== So that tells me the the "-t" options wasn't used for the poudriere run (or that poudriere testport wasn't used). If I am right, can you run it again with -t option this time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191713-13-VcGWdNSW9a>