From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 22 21:04:15 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA111065670
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:04:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941E68FC08
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:04:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	q8ML4EBG048011 for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:04:14 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <505E27CE.3060107@missouri.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:04:14 -0500
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
References: <5017111E.6060003@missouri.edu> <50553424.2080902@missouri.edu>
	<20120916134730.Y957@besplex.bde.org>
	<5055ECA8.2080008@missouri.edu>
	<20120917022614.R2943@besplex.bde.org>
	<50562213.9020400@missouri.edu>
	<20120917060116.G3825@besplex.bde.org>
	<50563C57.60806@missouri.edu>
	<20120918012459.V5094@besplex.bde.org>
	<5057A932.3000603@missouri.edu> <5057F24B.7020605@missouri.edu>
	<20120918162105.U991@besplex.bde.org>
	<20120918232850.N2144@besplex.bde.org>
	<20120919010613.T2493@besplex.bde.org>
	<505BD9B4.8020801@missouri.edu>
	<20120921172402.W945@besplex.bde.org>
	<20120921212525.W1732@besplex.bde.org>
	<505C7490.90600@missouri.edu>
	<20120922042112.E3044@besplex.bde.org>
	<505CBF14.70908@missouri.edu> <505CC11A.5030502@missouri.edu>
	<20120922081607.F3613@besplex.bde.org>
	<20120922091625.Y3828@besplex.b! de.org>
	<505D1037.8010202@missouri.edu>
	<20120922142349.X4599@besplex.bde.org>
	<20120923044814.S1465@besplex.bde.org>
	<505E2575.6030302@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <505E2575.6030302@missouri.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Complex arg-trig functions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions."
	<freebsd-numerics.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:04:16 -0000

1. Your recent optimizations seem to have given an overall 3% time 
saving in my timing tests.  That's pretty good in my opinion.

2.  In my accuracy tests for casin(h), I have never seen the double or 
long double have an error greater than 4 ULP.  But for the float case I 
have seen 4.15 ULP.

3.  I saw that you have ideas on making catanh have an error less than 1 
ULP.  Just saying that I saw those comments, although I didn't read them 
very carefully.