From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 21 23:50:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E264537B401; Wed, 21 May 2003 23:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-131.client.attbi.com
	[12.233.57.131])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 415A143F3F; Wed, 21 May 2003 23:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h4M6osqN009990;
	Wed, 21 May 2003 23:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from das@localhost)
	by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h4M6os9V009989;
	Wed, 21 May 2003 23:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:50:54 -0700
From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Hiten Pandya <hmp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20030522065054.GA9917@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Hiten Pandya <hmp@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org
References: <20030522021829.GA6619@perrin.int.nxad.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030522021829.GA6619@perrin.int.nxad.com>
cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: vnode(9) update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 06:50:57 -0000

On Wed, May 21, 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hello Gang.
> 
> I am requesting a review of removing the ``struct vnode'' from the
> vnode(9) manual page, and also updating a little text.  I was asked
> by some people to ask arch@ for a review before making such change,
> so here it is.  Patch is attached with this mail.

I find it useful in that it decreases the amount of cross-
referencing I need to do.  (It's great that section 9 in our
manual is reasonably complete these days!)  However, if it's hard
to keep the manpage in sync with the code, or if there's another
good reason to axe it, then by all means do.