From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 23:27:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C8E16A420; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:27:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [65.170.254.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F89943D48; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:27:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (unknown [70.152.101.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C112A; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:27:13 -0600 (CST) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id CFAC420FA3; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:27:11 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:27:11 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20051031232711.GD1367@over-yonder.net> References: <20051031102424.V11619@fledge.watson.org> <81484.1130756628@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81484.1130756628@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i-fullermd.2 Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , David Xu Subject: Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:27:14 -0000 On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:03:48PM +0100 I heard the voice of Poul-Henning Kamp, and lo! it spake thus: > > Another thing to remember is that the TSC and ACPI hardware is not > the only thing we have to deal with: Any solution we implement > needs to also work on other architectures, including i486 with only > i8254 timecounters etc. Boy, I'm just becoming the voice of not-so-new hardware, aren't I? ;) My PPro uses the i8254. So does my P133 laptop. I presume most other Pentium-era machines, and probably PII's, do as well. When DID ACPI become the common case? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.